I am a composer/performer/educator/curator/host/producer/guide.
I celebrate the ephemeral magic of the live,
the intra-actions that occur as we listen and musick together.
“What would it mean to compose if all sound was invited to be equally present? If each of us could fully inhabit our sound and we worked together towards a sonorous outcome?(…)
Would there be a distinction between our composition and our performance? Would that difference feel like a break in continuity? Would it involve a different quality of listening or a different way of knowing?
How would we make intelligent to ourselves the complexity of all the human and nonhuman intra-actions? How would we visualise their social and material organisation? What, Isadora’s research makes me wonder, would constitute a composition or a performance and the relationship between them, if all of their attributes were open to reimagining?
As an established composer and performer, Isadora has long considered these questions from the other end of the spectrum: working from music as a given, from the containment of space and time, of bodies and instruments, departing from the pecking order of the orchestra with its differentiated roles for composers, musicians and conductors; from the norms of composition notation, from the rules and habits and traditions of performance. Her concentrated exploration into the structures and textures of music has led her to the limits of the field itself, to the fact that the boundaries of any phenomenon closely examined are permeable and unfixed. She has sought within this mutability the possibility to reimagine composition and performance so that they more openly embrace the wider creative matrix that enables them to come into being.”
Lucy Cotter in Fieldings. Propositions for 3rd Cycle Education in the Performing Arts1
My understanding of music has been enriched and informed
by performing and composing, by musicking in:
New music ensembles
Javanese gamelan
Punk bands
Symphony Orchestras
Baroque ensembles
Improvisation groups
String quartets
Live electronic ensembles
And many other hybrid forms.
My involvement with de-colonial activism and simultaneous participation in Western art music in Aotearoa in the 80s, created an understanding that we are always situated. That we need to open our ears to the silencing that continues to take place—to nourish dialogue.
What do we hold on to?
What do we let go of?
Why?
What might speculative music sound like?
What is the place of aesthetics, and its relations with ethics,
process-based philosophy and the ecology of a practice?
My practice encompasses fully notated chamber works, indeterminate scores, soundwalks, music theatre works and lately also explores the possibilities of the audience score and ‘lay’ participants.
Many recent works can be seen as works in process, compositions-in-becoming. They are part of what Brian Massumi might call the anarchive. Scores can be responsive and flexible; they may adapt over time and create new iterations. In this website I have only included different iterations of works if they are significantly different – for instance versions for fixed or open instrumentation. I suggest, however, that whether a composition is fixed or has degrees of fluidity, the moment when a performance takes place is co-constituted by many actants – the audience, musicians, space, score and composer.
We are all in this together.
1Lucy Cotter ‘After a while, reflectively: Performing an ecology of a composition practice’, in Fieldings. Propositions for 3rd Cycle Education in the Performing Arts, ed. Sher Doruff (Amsterdam: DAS Publishing, 2021), 53-54.

One of Alison’s early recollections of contextual music-making occurred when, as a 9-year-old, she was asked to play violin for the gang members who lifted weights in the family garage. Numerous incidences involving symphony orchestras, punk bands, gamelan groups, free-improv ensembles and new music outfits stimulated an appreciation of the myriad creative intra-actions possible between the composer, score, performer, audience, and place.
Isadora was born and bred in Aotearoa/New Zealand and has been based in Amsterdam since the late 80s. She studied political philosophy and music at the Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), violin and composition at the Koninklijk Conservatorium (NL) and theatre studies at DasArts (NL).
Her compositions are performed in diverse latitudes by groups such as Modelo62, Ensemble Klang, Array (Canada), Decibel Ensemble (Australia) and STROMA (NZ). As well as composing chamber music, Isadora creates music-theatre performances, audio walks and installations.
She has been a research fellow at DAS THIRD (NL) and has recently completed a PhD at Te Herenga Waka/Victoria University of Wellington, entitled Performing the Ecology of a Composition-Practice-in-Becoming, employing multi-layered texts, bird song and recontextualised scores to encourage attention to the materiality of sound and to invite active, embodied and situational musicking.
Imagining:
an entangled composer who co-ordinates, initiates, co-creates, hosts and acts as guardian;
a recontextualized score which operates as an adaptive (notation) environment;
an implicated musician whose role may be expanded to include co-creator, teacher, and organiser;
an agential audience who may be an attuned listener, participant, and co-creator; and
a situated performance space.
In 2018 I began exploring the intra-relations between these 5 actants and the possible expansion of the roles. This has generated and continues to generate various forms of work. In 2022 I completed my PhD thesis Performing the Ecology of a Composition-Practice-in-Becoming in which I re-think the world of contemporary Western art music supported by ideas from process philosophy, feminist materialism, quantum physics and ecology, to name but a few.
Notions of situatedness, in the broadest sense, including Donna Haraway’s thoughts on situated knowledge, encourage us to attend to issues of an ethical nature. I suggest that who, where, what, and how, we do what we do, are questions we need to keep asking. Furthermore, historic habits require addressing.
We need to look at where we are and how we got here in order to allow ourselves to imagine what we might become.
The Together series (2018- ) is an evolving and expanding body of music which explores these ideas in practice, through co-constituted musical landscapes.
An expanded meaning of listening, incorporating the notion of ‘attending’, can be seen as a multifaceted tool capable of nourishing new relationships between actants. Agential, ecological, dialogic and diffractive listening are amongst the listening methods I propose to stimulate embodied co-constitutive relations.
The heartbeat has emerged as a potent tool for both situating actants and generating a recognition of connection.
In the Together series, multiple applications of situating the heartbeat for both musician and audience are explored as tools for expanding the actant’s field. In many works audience members are invited to attend to their heartbeat while listening to music which encourages shifting attention between personal and external systems and the development of complex listening skills. In Together#7, audience members ‘perform’ their heartbeats to the musicians, creating an autopoietic feedback loop, wherein the audience members embody the role of the conductor. By performing their own heartbeat or that of an audience member, the musicians create a polyrhythmic, indeterminate environment.
Together#5 was written for Ensemble Modelo62 and incorporates an indeterminate score based on the heartbeats of the musicians. Texts about the venue, which could be of a historic/geological/pre-colonial/mythological/or gossipy nature are created by the musicians who are also responsible for ordering these texts in the performance, stimulating awareness of the relationships that can occur between words and music. The audience follows a own score that encourages different forms of attention through the performance – for instance attending to their heartbeat while listening to the music. After the performance, a moment for introspection is offered where both the audience and musicians can write about their experience.
I consider feedback to be a way of creating moments for new forms of intra-action between the audience and musician, of reflecting together (through writing or talking). In the Together series the form of the feedback is dependent on context: questionnaires, Gossip sessions, plenary discussions or informal chats, are amongst the palette of possible shared situations that could be activated.
My explorations into the expanded roles of various actants has also led to an interest in composing situations that support the participation of people with different levels of musical knowledge. This might be: rehearsing material with the audience before the performance (in Together#9 and Klankbord for instance), organising listening workshops with school children resulting in illustrations for audience scores (Together#11 and Klankbord), or workshops with amateurs and lay participants culminating in co-created performances with professional musicians (Together#6, Together#11, Klankbord etc).
Together#6 arose out of a discussion with Ezequiel Menalled, the artistic leader of Ensemble Modelo62, regarding the challenges of co-creation within a limited rehearsal time. Could I create an environment which incorporated my interest in working with ‘lay’ participants and professionals within the timeframe of one day?
In Together#6 ‘lay’ participants and Modelo62 meet each other on the day of the performance and work together for several hours in one of four groups: Text/Ambient, Listening, Melody and Rhythm Group, seeding and growing their material. The instructions for these groups may range from prescriptions for the number of people playing and possible points of connection –leaving the musical content to the discretion of the participants— to traditionally notated music scores. The score is organised in blocks of 5 minutes which may be further subdivided. After a break for tea the groups come together and discover how their work intra-acts with the other groups.
I am interested in expanding the role of the composer to include host and ask myself how we can create situations in which we support a sense of (temporary) community. In Together#6 the participants and musicians eat a meal together before the performance, preferably delivered by a local eatery which reflects or is in dialogue with the environs of the rehearsal/performance. After the performance, there is time for a drink before a collective feedback session.
This brings me to another area of focus - ecological situatedness.
Where are we when we do what we do.
I am attempting to be alive to the becomings—the becoming together— in contemporary Western art music that may arise between various actants, both human and other-than-human.
In Together#5 my attention rests on the stories that the performance space may hold, but in many other works the sonic environment is also addressed agentially (as an intra-active collaborator). Each place has a ‘sonic fingerprint’, and by attending to this we create the conditions for another kind of attunement with our environment.
In Together#6 the Listening group explores the sonic neighbourhood of the rehearsal/performance venue for their material. In Together#11 local residents record a sound from their milieu and ‘translate’ this into music. In the Klankbord series I record local audio material which became the sonic building blocks for a work for 3 improvisers, a HyperTheremin player and audience participation.
Our domestic sound-world can also offer inspiration. In the Together#7 series the audience are invited to bring a household object to play during the work, in an attempt to stimulate another kind of awareness towards our domestic sound-world.
Audio connections are also be made with other species. Several works, such as Together#8 (The Blackbird With Us) and Together#9 (Sounding the Tūī), directly involve an avian contribution. In Together#8, the song of the blackbird in the inner garden of my neighbourhood block in Amsterdam became the primary musical material for a community Covid work performed from balconies, windows and gardens. Slowed down field recordings of the song of the tūī, made in a bird sanctuary in the heart of Whanganui-a-Tara (Wellington) provided the pitch material for Together#9 - a work in which choir members taught phrases of the birdsong to the audience before creating together a performance that spanned three floors of the sanctuary building.
I hope these works may stimulate discussions and practices within the new music community but also recognise that these considerations can have broader implications. In establishing the entanglement of actants within the composition-practice-in-becoming, I also acknowledge the ramifications this intertwinement may have for our intra-actions with humans and other-than-humans on a global scale. In the Together series we create music together through practising skills of ‘entendre’—attention—skills that I would suggest are not only beneficial for musicking, but also for the well-being of the planet.
ALISON ISADORA (1962 AOTEAROA/NZ)
GENERAL EDUCATION
MUSICAL EDUCATION
AS EDUCATOR
AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS
JURY FUNCTIONS
ORGANISATIONAL FUNCTIONS
PRINTED PUBLICATIONS (OTHER THAN SCORES)
SPOKEN TEXTS/ INTERVIEWS
SELECTION OF CHAMBER WORKS
MUSIC-THEATRE WORKS (MUSIC PLUS TEXT AND/OR IMAGE)
INSTALLATIONS AND SOUND WALKS
Funding sources.
Over the years the funding organisations in the Netherlands have changed names. I use these abbreviations:
FvSTK – Fonds voor de Scheppende Toonkust (no longer existing): Dutch Fund for Composers.
NFPK, NFPK+, FPK: Performing Arts Funds NL. AFK: Amsterdam Fund for the Arts.
ACTIVITIES AS PERFORMER
As improviser performed with: John Zorn, Derek Bailey, Butch Morris, Roscoe Mitchell among others. As interpreter worked with many composers including John Cage, Messiaen, Jonathon Harvey and Luca Fransesconi.
DISCOGRAPHY – AS COMPOSER
DISCOGRAPHY AS PERFORMER (INCOMPLETE)